The red arrow indicates 'disjoint classes'.
Millions, possibly billions, of people have come to believe what is essentially a conspiracy theory, generating fear and misunderstanding about a whole class of technologies on an unprecedentedly global scale.
This matters enormously because these technologies — in particular the various uses of molecular biology to enhance plant breeding potential — are clearly some of our most important tools for addressing food security and future environmental change.
This is what has happened with the GMOs food scare in Europe, Africa and many other parts of the world. Allowing anti-GMO activists to dictate policymaking on biotechnology is like putting homeopaths in charge of the health service, or asking anti-vaccine campaigners to take the lead in eradicating polio.
I believe the time has now come for everyone with a commitment to the primacy of the scientific method and evidence-based policy-making to decisively reject the anti-GMO conspiracy theory and to work together to begin to undo the damage that it has caused over the last decade and a half.
On a personal note, let me explain why I am standing here saying this. Believe me, I would much prefer to live a quieter life. However, following my apology for my former anti-GMO activism at my Oxford speech in January, I have been subject to a co-ordinated campaign of intimidation and hate, mostly via the internet.
Moreover, I have been encouraged by emails and other support from globally-renowned scientists who are experts on this issue, and who all said basically the same thing to me: I think these scientists are the unsung heroes of this saga.
They carried on with their important work and tried year after year to fight against the rising tide of misinformation, while people like me were belittling and undermining them at every turn. Some of them are here today, and I would like to give them my deepest thanks.
So for me also there is also a moral dimension to this. The fact that I helped promote unfounded scare stories in the early stages of the anti-GMO movement in the mid s is the reason why I now feel compelled to speak out against them. I have a personal responsibility to help put these myths to rest because I was so complicit in initially promoting them.
For me, apologising was therefore only the beginning. I am now convinced that many people have died unnecessarily because of mistakes that we in the environmental movement collectively made in promoting anti-GMO fear.
With that on your conscience, saying sorry and then moving on is not enough. Some restitution is in order. Following a decade and a half of scientific and field research, I think we can now say with very high confidence that the key tenets of the anti-GMO case were not just wrong in points of fact but in large parts the precise opposite of the truth.
This is why I use the term conspiracy theory. Populist ideas about conspiracies do not arise spontaneously in a political and historic vacuum. They result when powerful ideological narratives collide with major world events, rare occasions where even a tiny number of dedicated activists can create a lasting change in public consciousness.
More recently, conspiracy theories about reflected the hatred many on the political Left had for the Bush Administration. Successful conspiracy theories can do real damage.
In Nigeria an outbreak of Muslim conspiracy theorising against the polio vaccination campaign there led to a renewed polio outbreak which then spread to 20 other countries just when the disease was on the brink of being entirely eradicated.
The result in South Africa was that hundreds of thousands of people were denied life-saving anti-retroviral treatments and died unnecessarily.
The anti-GMO campaign has also undoubtedly led to unnecessary deaths. Thousands died because the President of Zambia believed the lies of western environmental groups that genetically modified corn provided by the World Food Programme was somehow poisonous.
I have yet to hear an apology from any of the responsible Western groups for their role in this humanitarian atrocity. Friends of the Earth was one of those responsible, and I note that not only has no apology been forthcoming, but Friends of the Earth Europe is still actively promoting GMO denialism in the EU in a new campaign called Stop the Crop.
Check out their Youtube video to see how they have learned nothing in ten years. Another well-known example is that of Golden Rice, genetically modified to contain high levels of beta carotene in order to compensate for the vitamin A deficiency which kills hundreds of thousands of children around the world and blinds many more every year.
Here the actions of Greenpeace in forestalling the use of golden rice to address micronutrient deficiencies in children makes them the moral and indeed practical equivalent of the Nigerian mullahs who preached against the polio vaccine — because they were stopping a lifesaving technology solely to flatter their own fanaticism.
I think this campaign is shameful and has brought the entire environmental movement into disrepute, with damaging consequences for the very beneficial work that many environmentalists do. The anti-GMO campaign does not even have the benefit of intellectual coherence.
This is like being against all computer software because you object to the dominant position of Microsoft Office.
On a logical basis only a case by case assessment makes sense for deciding how any technology might best be applied. This matters today more than ever because we are entering an age of increasingly threatening ecological scarcity. The planet is beginning to move outside the envelope of stable temperatures that we have enjoyed for 10, years, and into an age of instability and rapid change.
Within just a year from now, global CO2 concentrations will break through the crucial parts per million boundary, marking a change is atmospheric chemistry that is unprecedented for at least 3 million years. Moreover, we are now on a global emissions path which puts us on track for degrees Celsius of warming bya transformation which will leave this planet barely recognisable and considerably more hostile to human and other life.
But what about all those who say that global warming is a hoax, a product of thousands of scientists conspiring with governments and the UN to falsify temperature data and usher in a new age of global socialism? To make the point, here is the consensus position of the American Association for the Advancement of Sciences on climate change: Accumulating data from across the globe reveal a wide array of effects:This article was written for the Unz Review “Do you think his assessment is accurate?” was the subject line of an email I got from a good friend recently.
The email referred to the article by Paul Craig Roberts “One Day Tomorrow Won’t Arrive” which claimed that “the US military is now second class compared to the Russian military“.
Business Writing in Action. Search for: Sample Assessment: Email Evaluation. there are many ways to do so and thus the emails you produce will not be the same as the examples provided in the answers. Critique of E-mail from Charles Beckner to A. Thomas Lighthouse.
1. Salutation. Adaptation refers to action to prepare for and adjust to new conditions, thereby reducing harm or taking advantage of new opportunities.
Adaptation planning is occurring in the public and private sectors and at all levels of government but few measures have been implemented.
Writing; More. About Us; like needs assessment examples, can help the workforce to present their concerns, questions, and inquiries. Workplace assessments can be used to gather information in an objective, civil, and professional manner.
Referencing from the past assessments of the workplace can give you more information about the. I think the controversy over GMOs represents one of the greatest science communications failures of the past half-century.
Millions, possibly billions, of people have come to believe what is essentially a conspiracy theory, generating fear and misunderstanding about a whole class of technologies on an unprecedentedly global scale. Summary is indispensable in preparing for and writing an argumentative essay.
When you summarize a text (or describe visual material), you distill the ideas of another source for use in your own essay. Summarizing primary sources allows you to keep track of your observations.
It helps make your analysis of these sources convincing, because it is .