How to write a critique on a research article

Research Critique 1 Jamber, E. Investigating leadership, gender, and coaching level using the Revised Leadership for Sport Scale.

How to write a critique on a research article

Surely the article will be of good quality if it has made it through the peer review process? Unfortunately this is not always the case. Publication bias can occur when editors only accept manuscripts that have a bearing on the direction of their own research, or reject manuscripts with negative findings.

Performing your own critical analysis of an article allows you to consider its value to you and to your workplace. Critical evaluation is defined as a systematic way of considering the truthfulness of a piece of research, the results and how relevant and applicable they are.

Keywords Three to six keywords that encapsulate the main topics of the research will have been drawn from the body of the article.

Introduction This should include: Evidence of a literature review that is relevant and recent, critically appraising other works, not merely describing them Background information to the study, to orientate the reader to the problem Hypothesis or aims of the study Rationale for the study that justifies its need, i.

Materials and Methods Similar to a recipe, the description of materials and methods will allow others to replicate the study elsewhere if needed. It should both contain and justify the exact specifications of selection criteria, sample size, response rate and any statistics used.

This will demonstrate how the study is capable of achieving its aims. Things to consider in this section are: What sort of sampling technique and size was used? What proportion of the eligible sample participated? What were the strengths and weaknesses of the study?

how to write a critique on a research article

Were there threats to the reliability and validity of the study and were these controlled for? Were there any obvious biases? If a trial was undertaken, was it randomised, case controlled, blinded or double-blinded? At other times the barrier is harder, or even impossible to cross.

Communication difficulties arise even when a translator is available, and non-verbal messages may be missed by the patient or even by the health professional. Results Results should be statistically analysed and presented in a way that the average reader of the journal will understand.

Graphs and tables should be clear and promote clarity of the text. There were any major omissions in the results, which could indicate bias Percentages have been used to disguise small sample sizes The data generated is consistent with the data collected Negative results are just as relevant as research that produces positive results but as mentioned previously may be omitted in publication due to editorial bias.

Discussion This should show insight into the meaning and significance of the research findings. It should not introduce any new material, but should address how the aims of the study have been met.

The discussion should use previous research work and theoretical concepts as the context in which the new study can be interpreted. Any limitations of the study, including bias, should be clearly presented. You will need to evaluate whether the author has clearly interpreted the results of the study, or whether the results could be interpreted another way.

Conclusions These should be clearly stated and will only be valid if the study was reliable, valid and used a representative sample size. There may also be recommendations for further research.

References These should be relevant to the study, be up to date, and should provide a comprehensive list of citations within the text. Final Thoughts Undertaking a critique of a research article may seem challenging at first, but will help you to evaluate whether the article has relevance to your own practice and workplace.

Reading a single article can act as a springboard into researching the topic more widely and aids in ensuring your nursing practice remains current and is supported by existing literature.Research Proposal Example and Sample.

Most of the students struggle to find information on how to write a research proposal and spend lots of money when hiring others to complete the task.

APA format article critique follows a clear structure: Abstract. This section should consist of a brief summary of the critique you are going to provide. Write down how it will influence the reader and what analysis methods were used.

This paragraph should be words long with centered word ‘Abstract’ at the top; Body. Volume 12, No. 1, Art. 10 – January Autoethnography: An Overview 1). Carolyn Ellis, Tony E. Adams & Arthur P. Bochner.

Abstract: Autoethnography is an approach to research and writing that seeks to describe and systematically analyze personal experience in order to understand cultural kaja-net.com approach challenges canonical ways of doing research and representing others and.

Affordable Papers is an online writing service which has helped students from the UK, US, and Europe for more than 10 years. Our great experience enables us to provide papers of the best quality.

The main secrets of our good reputation are trustful relationships with customers and talented academic writers who always create first-chop papers from scratch.

Undertaking a critique of a research article may seem challenging at first, but will help you to evaluate whether the article has relevance to your own practice and workplace. Reading a single article can act as a springboard into researching the topic more widely and aids in ensuring your nursing practice remains current and is supported by.

The Online Writing Lab (OWL) at Purdue University houses writing resources and instructional material, and we provide these as a free service of the Writing Lab at Purdue.

How to Write an Article Critique. Example APA at KingEssays©